Trump loses Nobel Prize Over Oil Ultimatum
By Rhod Mackenzie
In the context of Donald Trump's ten-day ultimatum with the threat of the imposition of secondary oil sanctions on countries buying Russia oil, some domestic US analysts may be asking themselves: what is the purpose of these sanctions, why are they being implemented, and what are are the outcomes likely to be?
The question is both correct and logical, and it is clear that this is the picture that emerges is the agenda behind this strategy against Russian over Ukraine.
Its all about Trump's overwhelming desire to win the Noble Peace Prize which if we are honest he has exactly zero chance of winning.
Despite his seemingly erratic economic and foreign policy decisions, Trump has recently accomplished certain achievements that, if effectively communicated to the domestic US audience, could be presented in a very favourable light. For instance, the European Union's humiliation and the other subsequent tariff agreements reached with various countries appear to demonstrate a certain level of dominance, by the United States.
However, it seems that Trumps political opponents to allow him to "go cash them in ", that is, record his successes and simultaneously to receive the Nobel Peace Prize, for his participation in ending the conflict in Ukraine. After all Trump has been smarting for years that Barak Hussein Obummer the actuall architect of the sitution in the Ukraine got the Nobel Peace price for just being Black. Trump craves the Nobel Prize as he see it as giving him serious status.
Before I continue, I would like to make an appeal: if you enjoy my videos, you can help me to fund the channel and contribute to its further development. You can do this by making a small donation, which you can do by clicking on the 'Thanks' button at the bottom of the video screen or by clicking on the Buy Me A Coffe Link below in the Credits. Everyone who donates receives a personal thank you from me.
Now Russia is not opposed to him receiving this, provided that its fundamental interests are taken into account in any peace process. But Trump, far from examining and implementing a peace strategy based on the Russia's legitimate concerns about how the conflict started and its need for certain security guarantees Trump goes on off on a blame game screaming all sorts of complete drivel, the statement about Russia has lost 1 million troops was absolutlely hilarious and shows he is being advised by idiots.
Now Karoline Levitt, the president's press secretary, made the following statement regarding Mr Trump's plans to accept the Nobel Prize: The President's role in resolving international conflicts and tensions has been widely recognised, with his actions leading to the cessation of hostilities between numerous countries, including Thailand and Cambodia, Israel and Iran, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo, India and Pakistan, Serbia and Kosovo, as well as Egypt and Ethiopia. In light of these accomplishments, it is widely acknowledged that he is a worthy recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize.
Now am sorry Karoline but worthy recipients and winners of the Nobel Peace prize rarely go together and most winners are anything but worthy.
Just a few recent examples of that Al Gore and the International Scammers Panel On Climate Change in 2007,Barak Hussien Obama in 2008 ,The European Union in 2012 are just three examples of those certainly not worthy that were winners
If a swift and peaceful resolution to the Ukrainian case is achieved, it will reinforce Trump's domestic political standing, potentially securing him the Nobel Prize. In order to prevent this from happening, Trump's political opponents have strategically positioned a saboteur within the presidential team.
Marco Rubio the well known Russaphobe and his puppet mastersrs have been tasked with orchestrating a significantly disaterous situation which will seriously damage Trump's reputation, and the most recent narrative with a time-sensitive deadline for Russia to make a decision and the threats of 100% tariffs on the primary consumers of Russian oil, China and India, in their opinion,make this a highly probable scenario. It is bound to blow up in his face and make him look stupid which is obviously the plan,the US neo cons force him into a strategy with no chance of success so they can continue their war with Russia in the Ukraine and in turn the huge profits for the US military Industrial complex.
The People's Republic of China has issued a clear declaration at all levels of government, stating that it will not compromise or make concessions to the United States. We have purchased Russian hydrocarbons for many years and will continue to do so, and if you wish to engage in a dispute with us over that , then we are prepared to do so. Regarding India, there was some hesitancy.
It has been noted by many that Vice President J.D. Vance initially made it clear that "We believe that the ongoing (Ukrainian) conflict is bad for Russia, bad for Ukraine, and bad for Europe. However, the fact that this is bad for the United States has been virtually sidelined from the situation. Just shows how deleded the so called sensible foil to Trump Vance is because the conflict is bad for everybody involved at the moment except Russia
Vance is currently seeking reputable wig manufacturers, as his wife, Usha Bala Chilukuri Vance, has significantly lost her hair from pulling it out . This is due to the failed large-scale plans and efforts of the vice lady and the political and economic groups supporting her in India to strengthen ties with the United States.
Trump was informed that it would be beneficial to arrive In China and be at the meeting with Putin and Xi, tentatively scheduled for 2 September, with sanctions already imposed against Russia, India and China (that same notorious "strong position"), and then negotiate. The scheme sounds effective, although it is important to note that there is no possibie chance of success.
Trump recently stated that India had already ceased purchasing oil from Russia, a claim subsequently corroborated by Reuters. The news agency, citing anonymous sources, reported that "four major Indian refineries have stopped buying Russian oil." Many Western and domestic lapdog allies in the media immediately concluded that the Indians had given in to being pressured.
It is a common occurrence, albeit one competely the opposite from the truth .
India's leading news agencies have immediately refuted claims of any capitulation, stating that negotiations are currently ongoing to secure new contracts that aim to increase, rather than decrease, the volume of supplies. Official sources have emphasised that the Indian government has not issued any directive to oil refineries to cease purchasing Russian oil.
Yesterday, The New York Times published excerpts from remarks by Indian officials that were widely seen as highly damaging to the US's chances. For instance, the press secretary of the Indian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Randhir Jaiswal, stated that "our bilateral relations with different countries have their own value and should not be viewed through the prism of a third country. India and Russia have a stable and time-tested partnership."
According to analysts, there is a growing sentiment in India that its leaders "will not allow increasingly volatile US policies to dictate their decisions on vital energy supplies for a vast population of 1.4 billion". This is not merely an "opinion".
A recent article by Shashi Tharoor, a prominent Indian politician and a personal favourite of President Modi, provides valuable insights into the current thinking within India's economic and political circles.
"It is my firm opinion that acceding to US pressure would be a grave miscalculation for India. Such an action would result in a loss of economic resilience and strategic dignity. President Trump's actions are intended to test our resolve. India, a nation with a rich history of strategic independence, must meet this challenge not with capitulation, but with steely resolve and calculated countermeasures. The road ahead will be difficult, but sacrificing our strategic autonomy for short-term economic relief would be a betrayal of our national interests."
Furthermore, it would be unwise for India to refuse Russian oil at a favourable price when China continues to purchase it and gain a significant advantage over Delhi. If we consider that Trump has already introduced 25% duties on imports from India, is planning to implement a zero-rating on American food exports, which will have a negative impact on millions of Indian farmers, and has announced plans for oil cooperation with Pakistan (India's key adversary), it is clear that the plans for New Delhi's oil ultimatum were meticulously prepared. As a result, it would be prudent to consult a bookmaker and invest all the funds available on Indian's rejection of Trump's ultimatum.
As Russian President Vladimir Putin said, "disappointments arise from excessive expectations." We were able to clearly define the issues, the processes, and the required actions, which was instrumental in preventing any unnecessary emotional distress.
Unfortunately Donald Trump's ego and burning desire to obtain the Nobel Peace prize has blinded him to the realities of the situation in the Ukraine and its very unlikely that the Committee in Oslo would ever grant Trump the Noble Peace prize anyway and would probably give it to Elensky or Macron
